Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 17:48:10 GMT
In last night’s episode Tyrion and Jorah had a conversation about Dany. Tyrion wanted to know why Jorah was so intent in getting back to her and why did Jorah follow her.
I know some Dany fan’s are a little annoyed at the dialogue as the “darkwashing” of Dany continues. Now, I’m not keen on the darkening of Dany’s character. She already does questionable things, they don’t need to make it worst.
However, I think this was a good conversation. These are question that anyone who doesn’t know Dany (the whole of Westeros) would be asking themselves. Jorah probably knows Dany better than anyone, he loves and respects her but most importantly he believes in her. Tyrion on the other hand, doesn’t know her from a hole in the wall and everything he’s heard about her sounds great but he’s a cynic, so why should he believe it?
I think they are setting it up for us to see Dany through Tyrion’s eyes. The exposition Tyrion gave of Dany to fAegons in the booka was great:
In the books this works because we are in Tyrion’s head but I don’t think this would work on TV. He has to meet her and know her before he can say any of these things, if he says them at all. He can’t just be told these things and believe them, he has to find them out for himself. I think if Tyrion ends up supporting Dany it will be much more powerful if he does it out of respect for her, rather than out of a need for her to pardon him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 18:30:33 GMT
I was hoping Tyrion had said that the Targaryen dynasty is over, Stannis is the heir now. It didn't happen.
But I am looking forward to seeing Meereen from Tyrion's POV. For now it has been Dany.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 18:35:24 GMT
I wonder if and how Tyrion will confront her with her father, just as Barristan did. Dany clearly does not want to be Aerys III, but her hot blooded decisions are nothing what a queen should do. She previously realized that no one should be punished without a trial, yet she has given one of the masters to her dragons out of grief.
|
|
river
Fleabottom Peasant
Posts: 23
|
Post by river on May 18, 2015 20:59:50 GMT
I like that Tyrion is being skeptical and asking questions, as opposed to spouting flowery nonsense about a woman he's never even met on the basis of secondhand information as a way of GRRM pounding into our heads how oh-so-insightful he is. TV Tyrion is acting more the way he should be acting: properly suspicious of the hype and asking the right questions about Dany. It works for me. Besides, these are the exact same questions non-book readers have been asking as well.
1. How will Dany rule Westeros when she hasn't set foot in it for her adult life? 2. What would be so great about a Targ restoration when so many of the Targs were mad? 3. How is blood right an argument in favour of Dany being queen when her father was a sadistic madman?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 21:24:23 GMT
Completely agree with MoIaF on this. Jorah's reasons shouldn't just be hand waved away. In that world things do happen for a reason, there is a destiny for certain characters I think.
Of course most over at the other board are creaming themselves at this though. "See, even Tyrion knows she's crazy, and unfit to rule". I expect that opinion to change once he meets her. Doesn't really make sense to me otherwise.
|
|
sj4iy
Grumpkin
"Et tu, Brute?"
Posts: 354
|
Post by sj4iy on May 18, 2015 21:37:14 GMT
Tyrion basically voiced every reason I've had for being opposed to Dany ruling Westeros.
Basically, he's being realistic about it, instead of romantic. And I've never once said she was crazy- neither did Tyrion, tbh. He just said that the Targaryens are famous for it...meaning that maybe, just MAYBE, the people of Westeros wouldn't be jumping for joy at a new Targaryen dynasty built by the daughter of the Mad King.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 21:40:45 GMT
I see it as clearing the air. These are the questions niggling at us about Dany, even those of us who like her. Tyrion is acting as the reader/viewer and asking out loud, okay, so why her? Well, she's going to show Tyrion why her, and us too. That's my prediction.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on May 18, 2015 22:40:44 GMT
I like that Tyrion is being skeptical and asking questions, as opposed to spouting flowery nonsense about a woman he's never even met on the basis of secondhand information as a way of GRRM pounding into our heads how oh-so-insightful he is. Yeah, this worked better for me too, I hate it when tv characters are used to prop up another character to the audience when it's not earned with an actual relationship. Seven hells, "darkwashing", really?
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on May 18, 2015 22:59:06 GMT
Tyrion basically voiced every reason I've had for being opposed to Dany ruling Westeros. Basically, he's being realistic about it, instead of romantic. And I've never once said she was crazy- neither did Tyrion, tbh. He just said that the Targaryens are famous for it...meaning that maybe, just MAYBE, the people of Westeros wouldn't be jumping for joy at a new Targaryen dynasty built by the daughter of the Mad King. I totally loved this scene for that reason. Someone should be asking these questions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 23:07:03 GMT
I like that Tyrion is being skeptical and asking questions, as opposed to spouting flowery nonsense about a woman he's never even met on the basis of secondhand information as a way of GRRM pounding into our heads how oh-so-insightful he is. Yeah, this worked better for me too, I hate it when tv characters are used to prop up another character to the audience when it's not earned with an actual relationship. Seven hells, "darkwashing", really? What else could it be called? The show replaced an extremely touching scene from the books of Dany holding her hand maiden while she died, with a scene of her locking her in a vault to die. Then last episode we're treated to her feeding random people to her dragons. Those are just a couple examples off the top of my head.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on May 19, 2015 5:27:12 GMT
Yeah, this worked better for me too, I hate it when tv characters are used to prop up another character to the audience when it's not earned with an actual relationship. Seven hells, "darkwashing", really? What else could it be called? The show replaced an extremely touching scene from the books of Dany holding her hand maiden while she died, with a scene of her locking her in a vault to die. Then last episode we're treated to her feeding random people to her dragons. Those are just a couple examples off the top of my head. I believe the term is character assassination.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2015 8:31:54 GMT
I see it as clearing the air. These are the questions niggling at us about Dany, even those of us who like her. Tyrion is acting as the reader/viewer and asking out loud, okay, so why her? Well, she's going to show Tyrion why her, and us too. That's my prediction. I agree with you - it was a good way to set up the stage for Tyrion to learn for himself why Daenerys is fit to rule. I don't think the conversation did Dany disservice at all. It was simply a pragmatic look at the situation from Tyrion's cynical (and rightfully so) point of view. Daenerys could stand with a little 'darkening' or whatever people want to call it. I think she's been propped up a bit too much on the show to be honest. We got the full magnitude of her bad choices in the books, but everything on the show, even making Daario hot instead of the weird guy he was in the books makes her seem like a saint. Finally this season viewers are getting to see her make some dumb choices and it's necessary. Not because I dislike her - on the contrary. I like her very much she's one of my favorites. But because if the viewers do not get to see her make mistakes, learn from them, and move on in her "Queen training" how can it even make sense she will rule Westeros? Tyrion's skepticism is well founded and so should the audience be skeptical. She has proven she can make sound decisions, but she's also proven she can make mistakes. I don't think she's a mad Targ, her brother Viserys was that and we thankfully got rid of him early on. But the rest of the world does not know that yet. She's got lots to prove and staying in Meereen is not high on the list of valuable tactics. Get a move on girl!
|
|
King Tyrion I
Grumpkin
"I am the God of Tits and Wine!"
Posts: 373
|
Post by King Tyrion I on May 19, 2015 9:34:46 GMT
I see it as clearing the air. These are the questions niggling at us about Dany, even those of us who like her. Tyrion is acting as the reader/viewer and asking out loud, okay, so why her? Well, she's going to show Tyrion why her, and us too. That's my prediction. I agree with you - it was a good way to set up the stage for Tyrion to learn for himself why Daenerys is fit to rule. I don't think the conversation did Dany disservice at all. It was simply a pragmatic look at the situation from Tyrion's cynical (and rightfully so) point of view. Daenerys could stand with a little 'darkening' or whatever people want to call it. I think she's been propped up a bit too much on the show to be honest. We got the full magnitude of her bad choices in the books, but everything on the show, even making Daario hot instead of the weird guy he was in the books makes her seem like a saint. Finally this season viewers are getting to see her make some dumb choices and it's necessary. Not because I dislike her - on the contrary. I like her very much she's one of my favorites. But because if the viewers do not get to see her make mistakes, learn from them, and move on in her "Queen training" how can it even make sense she will rule Westeros? Tyrion's skepticism is well founded and so should the audience be skeptical. She has proven she can make sound decisions, but she's also proven she can make mistakes. I don't think she's a mad Targ, her brother Viserys was that and we thankfully got rid of him early on. But the rest of the world does not know that yet. She's got lots to prove and staying in Meereen is not high on the list of valuable tactics. Get a move on girl! Couldn't have said it any better. Thank you!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2015 12:02:05 GMT
I see it as clearing the air. These are the questions niggling at us about Dany, even those of us who like her. Tyrion is acting as the reader/viewer and asking out loud, okay, so why her? Well, she's going to show Tyrion why her, and us too. That's my prediction. I agree with you - it was a good way to set up the stage for Tyrion to learn for himself why Daenerys is fit to rule. I don't think the conversation did Dany disservice at all. It was simply a pragmatic look at the situation from Tyrion's cynical (and rightfully so) point of view. Daenerys could stand with a little 'darkening' or whatever people want to call it. I think she's been propped up a bit too much on the show to be honest. We got the full magnitude of her bad choices in the books, but everything on the show, even making Daario hot instead of the weird guy he was in the books makes her seem like a saint. Finally this season viewers are getting to see her make some dumb choices and it's necessary. Not because I dislike her - on the contrary. I like her very much she's one of my favorites. But because if the viewers do not get to see her make mistakes, learn from them, and move on in her "Queen training" how can it even make sense she will rule Westeros? Tyrion's skepticism is well founded and so should the audience be skeptical. She has proven she can make sound decisions, but she's also proven she can make mistakes. I don't think she's a mad Targ, her brother Viserys was that and we thankfully got rid of him early on. But the rest of the world does not know that yet. She's got lots to prove and staying in Meereen is not high on the list of valuable tactics. Get a move on girl! Perhaps because it's TV but the show has a hard time showing the nuance of her characters. She's either badass queen (one-dimensional) or vengeful queen. The humanity that Dany displays throughout the books is not there because a lot of it take place in the smaller moments Doreah, Missandei, Jorah, etc. Her characterization as been of extremes at times. I might not agree with everything Sean T. Collins at Boiled Leather says about Dany but these characterizations are insightful and I think it shows why it's so hard for the show to show this nuance: Getting back to the Tyrion thing, as I noted in the OP it's important for Tyrion to be a skeptic and a cynic about who she is. Jorah's belief is important but Jorah is also in love with Dany and people might see his devotion of her tainted by that. Tyrion is a blank slate, what he sees will be what is there. As I said, if he chooses to follow her after he meets her and gets to know her, it'll be so much more powerful than if he does it out of a personal need for vengeance or a pardon.
|
|
King Tyrion I
Grumpkin
"I am the God of Tits and Wine!"
Posts: 373
|
Post by King Tyrion I on May 19, 2015 12:25:32 GMT
That's also why I miss his ADwD moniker that so many people dislike. Tyrion does have an issue with prostitutes ever since the first book (and his memories of Tysha).
I'm okay with show!Tyrion. Don't get me wrong.
Tyrion - book and show - is not supposed to be funny IMO although he has his share of "funny" moments. He was a watcher first, but he was quickly forced to act - like reminding Joffrey of his duties.
That's another reason I like this scene so much. Tyrion asking all those questions about Dany. We know his thoughts from the books. And I think that scene does that credit. It really does.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2015 12:30:03 GMT
Yeah, this worked better for me too, I hate it when tv characters are used to prop up another character to the audience when it's not earned with an actual relationship. Seven hells, "darkwashing", really? What else could it be called? The show replaced an extremely touching scene from the books of Dany holding her hand maiden while she died, with a scene of her locking her in a vault to die. Then last episode we're treated to her feeding random people to her dragons. Those are just a couple examples off the top of my head. But in the books Dany orders Shavepate to torture and possibly rape two innocent little girls just because she wants answers from their dad.
|
|
sj4iy
Grumpkin
"Et tu, Brute?"
Posts: 354
|
Post by sj4iy on May 19, 2015 13:32:49 GMT
What else could it be called? The show replaced an extremely touching scene from the books of Dany holding her hand maiden while she died, with a scene of her locking her in a vault to die. Then last episode we're treated to her feeding random people to her dragons. Those are just a couple examples off the top of my head. But in the books Dany orders Shavepate to torture and possibly rape two innocent little girls just because she wants answers from their dad. Yeah, I think that is much worse than what she did in the show. It's completely unjustifiable. If the show is "assassinating" her character, then Martin pitched it off a cliff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2015 14:35:19 GMT
What else could it be called? The show replaced an extremely touching scene from the books of Dany holding her hand maiden while she died, with a scene of her locking her in a vault to die. Then last episode we're treated to her feeding random people to her dragons. Those are just a couple examples off the top of my head. But in the books Dany orders Shavepate to torture and possibly rape two innocent little girls just because she wants answers from their dad. Rape? Seriously? That is a huge leap from question them sharply. And goes against everything we know about Dany's stance on rape. Which she has been against since the first book. She also had rapists gelded in Meereen, so that's not something I think the Shavepate would have been doing. Question them sharply is just that, we also don't know that they were "little girls", but you choose to see them as such to make Dany look as bad as possible. That also goes against everything we know about Dany, children are her soft spot. She couldn't bring herself to harm any of her children hostages the entire time the SotH were killing her people. Anyway, I would have preferred a scene of her ordering a couple of people to be "questioned sharply", over that horrible scene of her feeding a man to her dragons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2015 14:40:36 GMT
But in the books Dany orders Shavepate to torture and possibly rape two innocent little girls just because she wants answers from their dad. Yeah, I think that is much worse than what she did in the show. It's completely unjustifiable. If the show is "assassinating" her character, then Martin pitched it off a cliff. That's ridiculous imo. We have no idea what "question them sharply" entailed, but I imagine it was run of the mill torture that many of the characters in ASOIAF use (Stannis, Qhorin, etc), the rape nonsense is complete fan fiction, and has no basis in the books, I think being devoured by a dragon is a hell of a lot worse personally, but hey thats me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2015 14:50:38 GMT
But in the books Dany orders Shavepate to torture and possibly rape two innocent little girls just because she wants answers from their dad. Rape? Seriously? That is a huge leap from question them sharply. And goes against everything we know about Dany's stance on rape. Which she has been against since the first book. She also had rapists gelded in Meereen, so that's not something I think the Shavepate would have been doing. Question them sharply is just that, we also don't know that they were "little girls", but you choose to see them as such to make Dany look as bad as possible. That also goes against everything we know about Dany, children are her soft spot. She couldn't bring herself to harm any of her children hostages the entire time the SotH were killing her people. Anyway, I would have preferred a scene of her ordering a couple of people to be "questioned sharply", over that horrible scene of her feeding a man to her dragons. No matter if they were little girls or not, she was still cruel. Shavepate tortures those girls. The raping part is implied later on. This is the exchange from the book: Mercy, thought Dany. They will have the dragon’s mercy. “Skahaz, I have changed my mind. Question the man sharply.” “I could. Or I could question the daughters sharply while the father looks on. That will wring some names from him.” “Do as you think best, but bring me names.” And she gelded rapists? Well yeah, but she also let few rapists who raped and murdered a young boy's mother during the sack of Meereen live, just because they swore loyalty to her. But lets not start this war. Dany still ordered Shavepate to torture innocent little girls just because she wanted answers from their father.
|
|