|
Post by mattpeto on Jun 22, 2016 13:40:37 GMT
True, but the director confirmed that he was there originally. He wasn't cut for the story and for all we know maybe he'd survive (I mean Jon did). He was cut because they decided to focus on the other special effect character (Wun-Wun). I think they made the right decision. Ghost would have been targeted and easily killed. Jon had pretty thick plot armour but ghost doesn't. Plus wolves are hard to CGI, and there was already so much of that going on. Yes, if it meant his survival, it surely worked out. What I'm hoping is we get a big payoff with Ghost next season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 13:42:04 GMT
True, but the director confirmed that he was there originally. He wasn't cut for the story and for all we know maybe he'd survive (I mean Jon did). He was cut because they decided to focus on the other special effect character (Wun-Wun). I think they made the right decision. Ghost would have been targeted and easily killed. Jon had pretty thick plot armour but ghost doesn't. Plus wolves are hard to CGI, and there was already so much of that going on. Agree! Ghost would have been a big white target in all that black and dark red, and Ramsay would have loved to kill him. It would have been dumb for him to be there unless he was armored, regardless of what the original screenplay said. On the subject of big, obvious targets, the only mistake Ramsay made was not shooting Jon when he came in range. I think he did that for emotional reasons. He wanted to see Jon charge him and get fucked up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 13:44:01 GMT
I think they made the right decision. Ghost would have been targeted and easily killed. Jon had pretty thick plot armour but ghost doesn't. Plus wolves are hard to CGI, and there was already so much of that going on. Yes, if it meant his survival, it surely worked out. What I'm hoping is we get a big payoff with Ghost next season. I'm sure we will get a bit of him next season. I think he'll be around to taste more of the wight delicacy in the north. Can't complain he was in quite a few scenes early in the season! @witchy Ramsay's mistake was being over-confident and being a sadistic asshole haha. Of course he wouldn't kill Jon straight away, he wanted him to suffer.
|
|
|
Post by boojam on Jun 22, 2016 13:53:27 GMT
UNSULLIED SCABBARD CLEANER Now! No hard rubbing! No Rinsing! Leave your blade bloody! Works on daggers, swords and blades of any kind! ]
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 13:58:15 GMT
UNSULLIED SCABBARD CLEANER Now! No hard rubbing! No Rinsing! Leave your blade bloody! Works on daggers, swords and blades of any kind! ] That bugged me too. I was being all OCD, wondering how long he was gonna wait before he wiped that blood off. Ain't that blade gonna rust, dude?
|
|
|
Post by freypies on Jun 22, 2016 15:29:09 GMT
Woah, this episode already has the most number of votes of any episode on IMDB. Crazy stuff.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on Jun 22, 2016 16:29:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by boojam on Jun 22, 2016 18:20:24 GMT
I knew Emilia was short but did not think Gemma was taller than her.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 19:47:24 GMT
I knew Emilia was short but did not think Gemma was taller than her. Team Targaryan is so tiny and fierce!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 19:50:10 GMT
For what it's worth, from a quick IMDB search Gemma' 5'5 and a half. While Emilia's 5'2.
|
|
|
Post by boojam on Jun 22, 2016 19:55:26 GMT
For what it's worth, from a quick IMDB search Gemma' 5'5 and a half. While Emilia's 5'2. Optical. -- Peter Ustinov
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 19:56:02 GMT
For what it's worth, from a quick IMDB search Gemma' 5'5 and a half. While Emilia's 5'2. Gemma is taller than me! Never mind. They're not _that_ tiny.
|
|
|
Post by Basil on Jun 22, 2016 19:58:06 GMT
I wonder if we're gonna get a reaction from Theon in regards to Ramsay's death.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 20:00:27 GMT
I wonder if we're gonna get a reaction from Theon in regards to Ramsay's death. I really hope so. He deserved to kill Ramsay even more than Sansa. Thing is, I don't think Theon will ever want to kill anyone again. He might do it, but he's over the thrill of violence.
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on Jun 22, 2016 20:14:21 GMT
For what it's worth, from a quick IMDB search Gemma' 5'5 and a half. While Emilia's 5'2. Gemma is taller than me! Never mind. They're not _that_ tiny. Gemma was also wearing some pretty high heels in that scene too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 20:16:50 GMT
Gemma is taller than me! Never mind. They're not _that_ tiny. Gemma was also wearing some pretty high heels in that scene too. booty enhancement
|
|
|
Post by Enid on Jun 22, 2016 20:20:17 GMT
Gemma is taller than me! Never mind. They're not _that_ tiny. Gemma was also wearing some pretty high heels in that scene too. Her heels weren't actually high, I'd say average height, closer to low heels. Also, 5'2 is the perfect height.
|
|
|
Post by mattpeto on Jun 22, 2016 20:21:08 GMT
It seemed to me that were different banners I couldn't exactly make out during Battle of the Bastards. I obviously saw the Stark and Mormont banners, as well as the Boltons, Umbers and Karstarks - but I felt like there were more for the Starks. Did anybody see a site/link that identified them?
|
|
|
Post by Basil on Jun 22, 2016 20:22:15 GMT
Too many Snowbowl avatars ... so confusing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2016 20:23:14 GMT
Gemma was also wearing some pretty high heels in that scene too. Her heels weren't actually high, I'd say average height, closer to low heels. Also, 5'2 is the perfect height. So, you're 5'2" and wear 3 inch heels, eh? Those are tall heels for me.
|
|