Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:06:25 GMT
It would be even better if the Starks won by mere force. Starks shouldn't be outnumbered that heavily. Perhaps Stannis actually wins battle of Ice in the books? I've been pondering that option for a while. I really can't see Stannis losing in the books. He most likely does lose, but I just can't understand how. Maybe the Northerners turn on him, but that would make no sense. He will certainly beat the Freys at the frozen lake, though. That I'm sure of. It is the entire point of LF's plan from S5. Of course it's happening. It has been prepared in S5. Unless the Valemen arrive earlier, but it's still going to be LF's plan. Eh... so? It is his plan. No one has said that it isn't. That doesn't mean that it should happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:07:25 GMT
It is the entire point of LF's plan from S5. Of course it's happening. It has been prepared in S5. Unless the Valemen arrive earlier, but it's still going to be LF's plan. Maybe it's happening. Doesn't mean I have to LIKE it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:07:49 GMT
Yeah. We know LF is there (the shot of him in the Godswood can only be from the finale), so the chances are, he appears mid-way through the battle when he's needed most.
But really, it is way to early to be judging this in any way. We have no idea how any of it is actually going to happen in context, we just know broad strokes which are not that meaningful.
And it would not be cheating the Starks out of a victory if one of them arrives with the Valemen to help, and it's probably because she's there that they even bother to help. Helping the Starks win back Winterfell and re-instating them as Wardens/Kings of the North is not the ideal situation for him. Letting the Starks lose and die and the Boltons weakened would be ideal, because then he could take out the new enemy of the Crown and get Winterfell like he wanted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:08:20 GMT
Starks shouldn't be outnumbered that heavily. Perhaps Stannis actually wins battle of Ice in the books? I've been pondering that option for a while. I really can't see Stannis losing in the books. He most likely does lose, but I just can't understand how. Maybe the Northerners turn on him, but that would make no sense. He will certainly beat the Freys at the frozen lake, though. That I'm sure of. It is the entire point of LF's plan from S5. Of course it's happening. It has been prepared in S5. Unless the Valemen arrive earlier, but it's still going to be LF's plan. Eh... so? It is his plan. No one has said that it isn't. That doesn't mean that it should happen. I'm not judging whether it's good or bad. But people say that it sounds fake as if it is unlikely, when LF's scenes in S5 make this super likely.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:09:18 GMT
It is the entire point of LF's plan from S5. Of course it's happening. It has been prepared in S5. Unless the Valemen arrive earlier, but it's still going to be LF's plan. Maybe it's happening. Doesn't mean I have to LIKE it! Of course not. I'm not saying that and I'm not judging it myself either. But you made it sound as if it is very unlikely, which IMO it's not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:09:26 GMT
I've been pondering that option for a while. I really can't see Stannis losing in the books. He most likely does lose, but I just can't understand how. Maybe the Northerners turn on him, but that would make no sense. He will certainly beat the Freys at the frozen lake, though. That I'm sure of. Eh... so? It is his plan. No one has said that it isn't. That doesn't mean that it should happen. I'm not judging whether it's good or bad. But people say that it sounds fake as if it is unlikely, when LF's scenes in S5 make this super likely. Oh, I believe these spoilers 100%. Only thing I doubt is that the Starks are outnumbered that heavily.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:12:34 GMT
Maybe it's happening. Doesn't mean I have to LIKE it! Of course not. I'm not saying that and I'm not judging it myself either. But you made it sound as if it is very unlikely, which IMO it's not. No, I was saying I think the spoiler source / leak is unlikely. I don't believe that post on reddit. People have pointed out descriptions in it that match some filming photos but that could just be how the dude based some of his story in the first place, from leaked filming photos. That's the part I'm saying I don't believe. I could actually believe LF showing up with the Vale as promised - yes it was set up in S5 as possible - I'm doing the re-watch of that right now. I'm saying I hate the idea of it and not just because it's the Vale and not Starks. They've done the mystery army showing up at the last minute to save the day thing enough times now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:16:00 GMT
Of course not. I'm not saying that and I'm not judging it myself either. But you made it sound as if it is very unlikely, which IMO it's not. No, I was saying I think the spoiler source / leak is unlikely. I don't believe that post on reddit. People have pointed out descriptions in it that match some filming photos but that could just be how the dude based some of his story in the first place, from leaked filming photos. That's the part I'm saying I don't believe. I could actually believe LF showing up with the Vale as promised - yes it was set up in S5 as possible - I'm doing the re-watch of that right now. I'm saying I hate the idea of it and not just because it's the Vale and not Starks. They've done the mystery army showing up at the last minute to save the day thing enough times now. Ok, fair enough! I get that. I for one will reserve judgement for now, because maybe Sansa will be more active in all of this than we think...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:27:35 GMT
Starks shouldn't be outnumbered that heavily. Perhaps Stannis actually wins battle of Ice in the books? I've been pondering that option for a while. I really can't see Stannis losing in the books. He most likely does lose, but I just can't understand how. Maybe the Northerners turn on him, but that would make no sense. He will certainly beat the Freys at the frozen lake, though. That I'm sure of. It is the entire point of LF's plan from S5. Of course it's happening. It has been prepared in S5. Unless the Valemen arrive earlier, but it's still going to be LF's plan. Eh... so? It is his plan. No one has said that it isn't. That doesn't mean that it should happen. He has the Manderly's turning on the Boltons, possibly Whoresbane. It just looks so good and even. I predict that Stannis wins outside Winterfell (the great "lighthouse" trick and the ice) but he'll die attempting to take Winterfell.. or Stannis wins and gets annihilated by the GNC/White walkers or something. Will Jon lead an army against the Boltons in the books or will he just pickup where Stannis left? Yeah LF's "rohirrim charge" is going to happen, but I don't really like it. We'll see. I'm not that annoyed that the victory will be "stolen" from the Starks (since Sansa will bring them there), but rather how the battle will feel and look like.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:34:21 GMT
Of course not. I'm not saying that and I'm not judging it myself either. But you made it sound as if it is very unlikely, which IMO it's not. No, I was saying I think the spoiler source / leak is unlikely. I don't believe that post on reddit. People have pointed out descriptions in it that match some filming photos but that could just be how the dude based some of his story in the first place, from leaked filming photos. That's the part I'm saying I don't believe. I could actually believe LF showing up with the Vale as promised - yes it was set up in S5 as possible - I'm doing the re-watch of that right now. I'm saying I hate the idea of it and not just because it's the Vale and not Starks. They've done the mystery army showing up at the last minute to save the day thing enough times now. It's not just the filming photos, it's the second trailer. He definitely was an extra. Maybe all of his info isn't true, but most of it is, no doubt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:39:38 GMT
No, I was saying I think the spoiler source / leak is unlikely. I don't believe that post on reddit. People have pointed out descriptions in it that match some filming photos but that could just be how the dude based some of his story in the first place, from leaked filming photos. That's the part I'm saying I don't believe. I could actually believe LF showing up with the Vale as promised - yes it was set up in S5 as possible - I'm doing the re-watch of that right now. I'm saying I hate the idea of it and not just because it's the Vale and not Starks. They've done the mystery army showing up at the last minute to save the day thing enough times now. It's not just the filming photos, it's the second trailer. He definitely was an extra. Maybe all of his info isn't true, but most of it is, no doubt. What makes you so sure?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 19:46:11 GMT
It's not just the filming photos, it's the second trailer. He definitely was an extra. Maybe all of his info isn't true, but most of it is, no doubt. What makes you so sure? The wall of bodies, for example. Everything he has said is in agreement with the set leaks, trailer footage, and WotW spoilers. The big cavalry shot, the Boltons encircling Jon's men. He told us about this before the trailer including those shots was released.
|
|
mandzipop
Grumpkin
Still in recovery from a naked Jon Snow
Posts: 333
|
Post by mandzipop on Apr 21, 2016 19:51:59 GMT
The wall of bodies, for example. Everything he has said is in agreement with the set leaks, trailer footage, and WotW spoilers. The big cavalry shot, the Boltons encircling Jon's men. He told us about this before the trailer including those shots was released. Also I think the original posts are a lot older than what is currently visible on Reddit. winteriscoming.net/2015/10/26/game-of-thrones-filming-at-knocklayde-northern-ireland/I was aware of the information about the battle back then. The posting has been removed.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on Apr 22, 2016 7:48:02 GMT
glad you've changed to a loyalist sigil, konrad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2016 7:49:33 GMT
glad you've changed to a loyalist sigil, konrad. Had to be done. Them non-Greatjon Umbers as Pycelle would put it "revealed their falseness."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2016 21:30:15 GMT
My reaction when Ramsay confirmed that house Manderly will appear this season. Since the Manderly banners are not visible in the Snowbowl pictures and videos, will they come with the Valemen and Sansa? It's quite weird that house Manderly hasn't been mentioned in any SNOWBOWL related leaks.
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on May 2, 2016 21:48:45 GMT
My reaction when Ramsay confirmed that house Manderly will appear this season. Since the Manderly banners are not visible in the Snowbowl pictures and videos, will they come with the Valemen and Sansa? It's quite weird that house Manderly hasn't been mentioned in any SNOWBOWL related leaks. Yeah, they wouldn't have mentioned the Manderlys if they were not going to play a role, and they estabalished that the Karstarks, Umbers and Manderlys are the most important houses in the North and together they have more men than all the other houses combined. Ramsay can't just get all three behind him. So yeah, they have to be part of SNOWBOWL and probably on the Stark side. I guess coming with LF's Valemen would be the only way to ge tthem there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2016 6:39:08 GMT
After ep. 602 and the promo for 603, I think the Snowbowl spoilers we've gotten make much more sense. In part now knowing how early in the season Rickon is given over to Ramsay (in 603) and in part now knowing that Fletcher from the casting calls will indeed be Wyman Manderly rather than just a fat Northern lord as an homage to the character and that the Manderlys are an important Northern house in the show with a big army of their own.
With the Smalljon betraying the Starks and Rickon this early on, it could only be in response to Jon letting the wildlings through the Wall. Previously a lot of us had figured we'd only meet Smalljon in 608 or something and Rickon would be turned over then. But knowing this happens earlier changes my perception of a lot of the spoilers. Firstly show Smalljon is basically a further representation of the sort of political intransigence Jon put up with NW guys like Thorne and wildlings like Loboda (the Thenn at Hardhome). He hates wildlings so much (and his House has traditionally) that he's willing to betray all else, like his loyalty to the Starks, to fight them. This fits with the bit in his casting call that "his hatreds run deep" or whatever the wording was exactly. I imagine part of his spiel we'll hear in 603 is that he feels his loyalty was conditional and that, unlike his dad, he's willing to stand against a Stark if it means backing a Warden of the North who'll face the wildlings with him.
Previously, before the Snowbowl spoilers, many of us had figured he'd be our Manderly stand-in and dramatically switch sides and prove to be actually loyal. Those proved this idea very wrong. Basically, like our young Lord Karstark, he's a massive weenie and disloyal turd. But the good news is we actually have a Manderly now.
This question of who's the worse threat the wildlings or the Boltons will come up elsewhere, I think. That is why Davos is bringing up the Long Night and the Army of the Dead and whatnot in his Bear Island scene from the trailers. All the Northern houses are wary of wildlings and probably initially unwilling to fight alongside them. Which is why silver-tongued Davos has to explain the greater stakes to them. Which will likely lead to him winning over many of the lords at that sitdown.
One question many of us had about the Snowbowl spoilers was why would Jon face a Bolton-Umber-Karstark coalition with his comparatively low numbers? I think them having Rickon answers this. Rickon will be mentioned in whatever showPink Letter we get. He will be a major motivating factor in rallying many of the loyalist houses to face the Boltons. If he'd only got Rickon late in the season this would be different. Rickon would be the wild card at the Snowbowl. But since he gets him in 603, this means that saving Rickon is probably a major factor in why Jon and his army meet Ramsay's when they do. I imagine a specific threat is made against Rickon's life luring them south and Jon away from the Wall. Maybe something like, "I'll kill him on such-and-such-a day unless you ______". Fill in the blanks as you may, I think this explains the urgency and why anyone would be willing to face those odds.
Also I imagine Ramsay will threaten Castle Black which will also make Jon understand that he can't stay there anymore. As in ADWD.
Now on to Manderly. Rams mentioned him in 602, so the Fletcher casting call is definitely for him. But we also know that there were no Manderly banners in Jon's group of loyalists at the Snowbowl. And that his army is big enough that Jon would likely be much larger if his men were there. So where is he? As a lot of us speculated yesterday; they're with the Knights of the Vale and Sansa. This makes sense in particular because of where White Harbour is located. It makes sense that if ships full of Valemen were to sail North, that's where they'd dock.
I don't know if he'll be at the big Northern lord meeting on Bear Island (which I think will be around ep. 606) and if that's when he'll give his speech...or if Sansa will teleport there later in the season, but he's perfectly positioned to be the reason she's not with Jon's group and the reason that the Valemen enter the North. So either she goes with him from Bear Island to White Harbour or she just goes to White Harbour to Bear Island after the first meeting of the lords to meet him in 608 or something... this would explain why the Manderlys merited mentioning in 602 as a major house, haven't sided with the Boltons by the time of the Snowbowl and weren't among Jon's loyalists either.
They are the port in the North nearest to the Vale (and IIRC Ned went that away when he was sneaking out of the Eyrie during Robert's Rebellion, as Davos learned in some ADWD chapter or another), so it stands to reason that's where Sansa would go after Bear Island and that's how LF, Royce and the Knights of the Vale find their way to the Snowbowl. So even if Manderly himself is just in the show to give a single speech, it seems his house will be very important nonetheless in the rundown of the Snowbowl.
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on May 3, 2016 7:11:12 GMT
After ep. 602 and the promo for 603, I think the Snowbowl spoilers we've gotten make much more sense. In part now knowing how early in the season Rickon is given over to Ramsay (in 603) and in part now knowing that Fletcher from the casting calls will indeed be Wyman Manderly rather than just a fat Northern lord as an homage to the character and that the Manderlys are an important Northern house in the show with a big army of their own.
With the Smalljon betraying the Starks and Rickon this early on, it could only be in response to Jon letting the wildlings through the Wall. Previously a lot of us had figured we'd only meet Smalljon in 608 or something and Rickon would be turned over then. But knowing this happens earlier changes my perception of a lot of the spoilers. Firstly show Smalljon is basically a further representation of the sort of political intransigence Jon put up with NW guys like Thorne and wildlings like Loboda (the Thenn at Hardhome). He hates wildlings so much (and his House has traditionally) that he's willing to betray all else, like his loyalty to the Starks, to fight them. This fits with the bit in his casting call that "his hatreds run deep" or whatever the wording was exactly. I imagine part of his spiel we'll hear in 603 is that he feels his loyalty was conditional and that, unlike his dad, he's willing to stand against a Stark if it means backing a Warden of the North who'll face the wildlings with him.
Previously, before the Snowbowl spoilers, many of us had figured he'd be our Manderly stand-in and dramatically switch sides and prove to be actually loyal. Those proved this idea very wrong. Basically, like our young Lord Karstark, he's a massive weenie and disloyal turd. But the good news is we actually have a Manderly now.
This question of who's the worse threat the wildlings or the Boltons will come up elsewhere, I think. That is why Davos is bringing up the Long Night and the Army of the Dead and whatnot in his Bear Island scene from the trailers. All the Northern houses are wary of wildlings and probably initially unwilling to fight alongside them. Which is why silver-tongued Davos has to explain the greater stakes to them. Which will likely lead to him winning over many of the lords at that sitdown.
One question many of us had about the Snowbowl spoilers was why would Jon face a Bolton-Umber-Karstark coalition with his comparatively low numbers? I think them having Rickon answers this. Rickon will be mentioned in whatever showPink Letter we get. He will be a major motivating factor in rallying many of the loyalist houses to face the Boltons. If he'd only got Rickon late in the season this would be different. Rickon would be the wild card at the Snowbowl. But since he gets him in 603, this means that saving Rickon is probably a major factor in why Jon and his army meet Ramsay's when they do. I imagine a specific threat is made against Rickon's life luring them south and Jon away from the Wall. Maybe something like, "I'll kill him on such-and-such-a day unless you ______". Fill in the blanks as you may, I think this explains the urgency and why anyone would be willing to face those odds.
Also I imagine Ramsay will threaten Castle Black which will also make Jon understand that he can't stay there anymore. As in ADWD.
Now on to Manderly. Rams mentioned him in 602, so the Fletcher casting call is definitely for him. But we also know that there were no Manderly banners in Jon's group of loyalists at the Snowbowl. And that his army is big enough that Jon would likely be much larger if his men were there. So where is he? As a lot of us speculated yesterday; they're with the Knights of the Vale and Sansa. This makes sense in particular because of where White Harbour is located. It makes sense that if ships full of Valemen were to sail North, that's where they'd dock.
I don't know if he'll be at the big Northern lord meeting on Bear Island (which I think will be around ep. 606) and if that's when he'll give his speech...or if Sansa will teleport there later in the season, but he's perfectly positioned to be the reason she's not with Jon's group and the reason that the Valemen enter the North. So either she goes with him from Bear Island to White Harbour or she just goes to White Harbour to Bear Island after the first meeting of the lords to meet him in 608 or something... this would explain why the Manderlys merited mentioning in 602 as a major house, haven't sided with the Boltons by the time of the Snowbowl and weren't among Jon's loyalists either.
They are the port in the North nearest to the Vale (and IIRC Ned went that away when he was sneaking out of the Eyrie during Robert's Rebellion, as Davos learned in some ADWD chapter or another), so it stands to reason that's where Sansa would go after Bear Island and that's how LF, Royce and the Knights of the Vale find their way to the Snowbowl. So even if Manderly himself is just in the show to give a single speech, it seems his house will be very important nonetheless in the rundown of the Snowbowl. I'm just still not 100% sold on Smalljon truly siding with Ramsay. I know he's fighting for the Boltons at SNOWBOWL, but it's possible that he changes sides during the battle, maybe right before/after Littlefinger shows up with the Manderlys.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2016 7:12:51 GMT
After ep. 602 and the promo for 603, I think the Snowbowl spoilers we've gotten make much more sense. In part now knowing how early in the season Rickon is given over to Ramsay (in 603) and in part now knowing that Fletcher from the casting calls will indeed be Wyman Manderly rather than just a fat Northern lord as an homage to the character and that the Manderlys are an important Northern house in the show with a big army of their own.
With the Smalljon betraying the Starks and Rickon this early on, it could only be in response to Jon letting the wildlings through the Wall. Previously a lot of us had figured we'd only meet Smalljon in 608 or something and Rickon would be turned over then. But knowing this happens earlier changes my perception of a lot of the spoilers. Firstly show Smalljon is basically a further representation of the sort of political intransigence Jon put up with NW guys like Thorne and wildlings like Loboda (the Thenn at Hardhome). He hates wildlings so much (and his House has traditionally) that he's willing to betray all else, like his loyalty to the Starks, to fight them. This fits with the bit in his casting call that "his hatreds run deep" or whatever the wording was exactly. I imagine part of his spiel we'll hear in 603 is that he feels his loyalty was conditional and that, unlike his dad, he's willing to stand against a Stark if it means backing a Warden of the North who'll face the wildlings with him.
Previously, before the Snowbowl spoilers, many of us had figured he'd be our Manderly stand-in and dramatically switch sides and prove to be actually loyal. Those proved this idea very wrong. Basically, like our young Lord Karstark, he's a massive weenie and disloyal turd. But the good news is we actually have a Manderly now.
This question of who's the worse threat the wildlings or the Boltons will come up elsewhere, I think. That is why Davos is bringing up the Long Night and the Army of the Dead and whatnot in his Bear Island scene from the trailers. All the Northern houses are wary of wildlings and probably initially unwilling to fight alongside them. Which is why silver-tongued Davos has to explain the greater stakes to them. Which will likely lead to him winning over many of the lords at that sitdown.
One question many of us had about the Snowbowl spoilers was why would Jon face a Bolton-Umber-Karstark coalition with his comparatively low numbers? I think them having Rickon answers this. Rickon will be mentioned in whatever showPink Letter we get. He will be a major motivating factor in rallying many of the loyalist houses to face the Boltons. If he'd only got Rickon late in the season this would be different. Rickon would be the wild card at the Snowbowl. But since he gets him in 603, this means that saving Rickon is probably a major factor in why Jon and his army meet Ramsay's when they do. I imagine a specific threat is made against Rickon's life luring them south and Jon away from the Wall. Maybe something like, "I'll kill him on such-and-such-a day unless you ______". Fill in the blanks as you may, I think this explains the urgency and why anyone would be willing to face those odds.
Also I imagine Ramsay will threaten Castle Black which will also make Jon understand that he can't stay there anymore. As in ADWD.
Now on to Manderly. Rams mentioned him in 602, so the Fletcher casting call is definitely for him. But we also know that there were no Manderly banners in Jon's group of loyalists at the Snowbowl. And that his army is big enough that Jon would likely be much larger if his men were there. So where is he? As a lot of us speculated yesterday; they're with the Knights of the Vale and Sansa. This makes sense in particular because of where White Harbour is located. It makes sense that if ships full of Valemen were to sail North, that's where they'd dock.
I don't know if he'll be at the big Northern lord meeting on Bear Island (which I think will be around ep. 606) and if that's when he'll give his speech...or if Sansa will teleport there later in the season, but he's perfectly positioned to be the reason she's not with Jon's group and the reason that the Valemen enter the North. So either she goes with him from Bear Island to White Harbour or she just goes to White Harbour to Bear Island after the first meeting of the lords to meet him in 608 or something... this would explain why the Manderlys merited mentioning in 602 as a major house, haven't sided with the Boltons by the time of the Snowbowl and weren't among Jon's loyalists either.
They are the port in the North nearest to the Vale (and IIRC Ned went that away when he was sneaking out of the Eyrie during Robert's Rebellion, as Davos learned in some ADWD chapter or another), so it stands to reason that's where Sansa would go after Bear Island and that's how LF, Royce and the Knights of the Vale find their way to the Snowbowl. So even if Manderly himself is just in the show to give a single speech, it seems his house will be very important nonetheless in the rundown of the Snowbowl. I'm just still not 100% sold on Smalljon truly siding with Ramsay. I know he's fighting for the Boltons at SNOWBOWL, but it's possible that he changes sides during the battle, maybe right before/after Littlefinger shows up with the Manderlys. I was worried you'd get me with a TLDR gif. Because I wrote WAY too much shit just there.
|
|