Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 4:24:10 GMT
Yeah, I didn't get the feeling in s5 that Domeric existed in the showverse. IIRC McElhatton said as much in an interview about the differences between book and show Roose. That that along with the leeches and a few other things were things he expected to be in from his readings but when he realized his version was going to be more toned down he didn't finish reading ASOIAF.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on Apr 2, 2016 5:12:00 GMT
Yeah, I didn't get the feeling in s5 that Domeric existed in the showverse. IIRC McElhatton said as much in an interview about the differences between book and show Roose. That that along with the leeches and a few other things were things he expected to be in from his readings but when he realized his version was going to be more toned down he didn't finish reading ASOIAF. That makes sense. They also toned down Ramsay's history by omitting the first Reek and Ramsay's first marriage. It'd actually be odd imo if Domeric was kept while so much else was changed.
|
|
|
Post by archiechvyalthan on Apr 2, 2016 6:03:05 GMT
I wonder if they'll bring up Domeric in the show. I don't really think Domeric is needed, to be honest. Walda being pregnant coupled with the increased tension between Roose and Ramsay since Sansa and Theon escaped will probably be enough to make the audience think the Boltons could turn on each other, which I think is the reason why the Domeric story existed in the books. Continuing on that strain of thought, I felt in the books that Roose might try to throw Ramsay under the bus in the near future. Recall Wyman saying that Roose was cold but that they could at least deal with him compared to his bastard. Perhaps Roose in the show might try something similar. "He burned down Winterfell, abused Sansa, and ruined Theon. He is an evil bastard, and I can't control him. Ally with me against these Wildlings, and I will give you Ramsay." Something along those lines. What if Ramsay finds this out and preemptively does that to Roose instead? "He killed your king at a wedding. Everything I did was just following my father's orders. Ally with me against these Wildlings, and we can get rid of my father and make the North great again!" That would be very smart of Ramsay and could win him some fans in the North.... but if he kills Rickon as some leaks suggest, then all of that goes down the toilet. Raping a Stark and killing another would be just as bad as Roose killing their northern king.
|
|
|
Post by freeparking on Apr 2, 2016 7:49:41 GMT
I don't really think Domeric is needed, to be honest. Walda being pregnant coupled with the increased tension between Roose and Ramsay since Sansa and Theon escaped will probably be enough to make the audience think the Boltons could turn on each other, which I think is the reason why the Domeric story existed in the books. Continuing on that strain of thought, I felt in the books that Roose might try to throw Ramsay under the bus in the near future. Recall Wyman saying that Roose was cold but that they could at least deal with him compared to his bastard. Perhaps Roose in the show might try something similar. "He burned down Winterfell, abused Sansa, and ruined Theon. He is an evil bastard, and I can't control him. Ally with me against these Wildlings, and I will give you Ramsay." Something along those lines. What if Ramsay finds this out and preemptively does that to Roose instead? "He killed your king at a wedding. Everything I did was just following my father's orders. Ally with me against these Wildlings, and we can get rid of my father and make the North great again!" That would be very smart of Ramsay and could win him some fans in the North.... but if he kills Rickon as some leaks suggest, then all of that goes down the toilet. Raping a Stark and killing another would be just as bad as Roose killing their northern king. Although abhorrent to us (and is certainly rape to me), keep in mind that from Westeros's point of view, Ramsay didn't rape Sansa. She is his wife. The worse he did was beat her around a bit, and I would be shocked if he was the first abusive husband. Plus he could claim he was doing what Roose told him to do. The Rickon issue is trickier. Let's say Ramsay does what I think he will do and betrays Roose to the Northern lords. Everybody gathers on the battlefield ready to kill the Wildlings and whoever else joined Jon "The Oathbreaker." Right before the battle starts Ramsay has Rickon killed and reveals Roose's and Walda's (she's a Frey, Northerners don't like Freys) bodies. What happens now? Does the Bolton army really turn on the last surviving person with Bolton blood? Do the Northerners on Ramsay's side turn on him? Bran and Arya have been gone so long that they are presumed dead, and Jon is a bastard that abandoned the Wall with some flimsy resurrection lie leading an invading Wildling army. The only other Stark is Sansa, who is married to Ramsay. Is a soldier eager to turn on his own people when an enemy army is just across the field. After all, no matter what they do, that Wildling army will still be there. The armies themselves show that there is no unified North, with houses on both sides. Would the Bolton army protect Ramsay? Would the Karstarks? Would you risk having your side rip itself apart while the Wildlings mop up? I think Ramsay will play on people's hatreds and fears to push the car down a hill before he reveals that the breaks are cut. It will be too far gone to go back. As for Ramsay's long term goals, he weakens the North enough so nobody can oppose him. Maybe Walda gave birth and he holds the child as a hostage to ensure Bolton army loyalty. Maybe the Karstarks just hate the Starks now because of what Robb did. It is important to note that in my scenario Ramsay feels that he must betray Roose in order to survive. He will also probably feel the need to eliminate Rickon because the Northern lords could use him to rally around after the Wildlings are dead. I think some of the Northern lords that join the Boltons will just be doing it to defeat the Wildlings and then plan on betraying the weakened Boltons. Without Rickon though, betraying the Boltons is a terrible idea because it would just create a power vacuum. Kind of like if you got rid of Tommen in King's Landing. Ramsay might realize this and give him motivation to off Rickon. If they kill Ramsay at that point, then they are just stuck will Sansa, which again would probably lead to infighting among the lords on who gets to marry her. Problem is, Ramsay is not expecting LF and the Vale, or he is but is expecting them to be on his side.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 8:01:10 GMT
There is, broadly, a sort of "apprenticeship" under-story going on that is quite interesting to speculate on. Varys seems to be backing Tyrion in the show, although a lot of people think he may be connected to the FM and thus Arya's training. In the books he definitely had a hand in the training of Aegon...but we will see if that amounts to anything. LF of course is sort of exploitraining Sansa with plans of world domination through her somehow. Then there is the clearer parallel of Bran's greenseer training and Arya's FM training, via Bloodraven and the Kindly Man whoever he may be/have been. So, IMO it might be more complex than just an LF/Varys showdown, depending on what links if any exist between these various actors. LF of course has some hinted links to Braavos. Not just his family background but also his boat, and his ease in getting loans from the IB. If Varys is indeed connected to the FM then the power showdown that is coming up in Braavos after the death of the sealord may turn out to be not so peripheral to the central story. While the books have time and space to have a hundred different factions with a hundred different motivations, I don't think the show has that luxury. I expect groups like the Faceless Men and the Maesters to have truncated stories and for them to be quickly cut from the rest of the story or join Team Jon or Team Dany. LF and Varys and their seemingly opposing desires have been around since the first season, while Bloodraven and the Iron Bank have not. Whatever may happen in the books, I suspect that the LF and Varys rivalry will be a major focus for the show and how their plotting for their respective teams is actually damaging to a unified front against the White Walkers. The other factions will be nullified, destroyed, or absorbed into which ever team they join I see it really quite differently. I don't think the story, ultimately, is actually about the fight for the throne, or that it can in any way be distilled down to Jon vs/and Dany. Varys and LF of course are about contolling/influencing whoever is on the throne, and preferably their chosen person for that role. So yes THEIR conflict is about factions vying for the throne. The Iron Bank, as well, has a direct interest in influencing who sits on the throne. But Bloodraven and the FM? That is not their primary concern at all. What they are after is much broader, and may indeed be opposite sides of a greater conflict than the throne. The show may need to simplify things, agreed, but not to the point where they actually lose the whole point of the story which is ultimately NOT about who sits on the throne. Which is why Bloodraven and the FM, even though their part came later in general, are at least as important as LF and Varys.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 8:16:25 GMT
I rewatched ep. 202 today btw (which incidentally is probably my least-favourite episode in the show) and realized that Euron's return to Pyke will probably be paralleled quite a bit with Theon's, albeit with very different power dynamics at play. But if indeed he's greeted by Yara and then meets Balon inside Pyke itself in the second episode of a season, I can imagine a number of other parallels cropping up too in the writing and staging of the scene.
|
|
|
Post by freeparking on Apr 2, 2016 8:24:09 GMT
While the books have time and space to have a hundred different factions with a hundred different motivations, I don't think the show has that luxury. I expect groups like the Faceless Men and the Maesters to have truncated stories and for them to be quickly cut from the rest of the story or join Team Jon or Team Dany. LF and Varys and their seemingly opposing desires have been around since the first season, while Bloodraven and the Iron Bank have not. Whatever may happen in the books, I suspect that the LF and Varys rivalry will be a major focus for the show and how their plotting for their respective teams is actually damaging to a unified front against the White Walkers. The other factions will be nullified, destroyed, or absorbed into which ever team they join I see it really quite differently. I don't think the story, ultimately, is actually about the fight for the throne, or that it can in any way be distilled down to Jon vs/and Dany. Varys and LF of course are about contolling/influencing whoever is on the throne, and preferably their chosen person for that role. So yes THEIR conflict is about factions vying for the throne. The Iron Bank, as well, has a direct interest in influencing who sits on the throne. But Bloodraven and the FM? That is not their primary concern at all. What they are after is much broader, and may indeed be opposite sides of a greater conflict than the throne. The show may need to simplify things, agreed, but not to the point where they actually lose the whole point of the story which is ultimately NOT about who sits on the throne. Which is why Bloodraven and the FM, even though their part came later in general, are at least as important as LF and Varys. I didn't say that Dany and Jon would necessarily be fighting for the throne. In their hearts, both characters want to be heroes and saviors. They want to right the wrongs in the world. Whether that is ending slavery or bringing people together to fight an encroaching icy menace. When the Iron Throne is destroyed once King's Landing goes up in flames, politics won't end. Politics will always be there. As the story moves on and winter arrives, the magic and politics will merge more and more. So no, it is not all about who sits the Iron Throne, and I never claimed it was. LF and Varys will be concerned about that, but they will fall under the umbrellas of Jon and Dany who have broader concerns in the end.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 8:42:19 GMT
I didn't say that Dany and Jon would necessarily be fighting for the throne. In their hearts, both characters want to be heroes and saviors. They want to right the wrongs in the world. Whether that is ending slavery or bringing people together to fight an encroaching icy menace. When the Iron Throne is destroyed once King's Landing goes up in flames, politics won't end. Politics will always be there. As the story moves on and winter arrives, the magic and politics will merge more and more. So no, it is not all about who sits the Iron Throne, and I never claimed it was. LF and Varys will be concerned about that, but they will fall under the umbrellas of Jon and Dany who have broader concerns in the end. Fine, but again, this is not about Jon and/vs Dany. And if you agree there are greater things at stake than the throne, then your focus on Varys vs. Littlefinger makes no sense since both of them are about political power, ie. the throne and controlling who is on it. I agree they are important. I fundamentally disagree they are more important than Bloodraven and the FM.
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on Apr 2, 2016 8:52:55 GMT
So apparently the Boltons make a visit to Castle Black at some point in the season: https://www.reddit.com/r/asoiaf/comments/4czqzu/spoilers_everything_hints_about_season_6_in_three/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 9:05:38 GMT
So apparently the Boltons make a visit to Castle Black at some point in the season: https://www.reddit.com/r/asoiaf/comments/4czqzu/spoilers_everything_hints_about_season_6_in_three/ It is the same interview Archie linked a few pages back, right? That one with the Britney translation issues? They would likely look for Sansa and Theon there but I don't know how that'll fit into our timeline, so I'll wait for your speculations.
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on Apr 2, 2016 9:09:10 GMT
So apparently the Boltons make a visit to Castle Black at some point in the season: https://www.reddit.com/r/asoiaf/comments/4czqzu/spoilers_everything_hints_about_season_6_in_three/ It is the same interview Archie linked a few pages back, right? That one with the Britney translation issues? They would likely look for Sansa and Theon there but I don't know how that'll fit into our timeline, so I'll wait for your speculations. I thnk it's the same interview, but I don't remember seeing anything about the Boltons going to CB. Maybe there's no Pink Letter, only Ramsay talking to Jon face to face.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on Apr 2, 2016 9:21:49 GMT
It is the same interview Archie linked a few pages back, right? That one with the Britney translation issues? They would likely look for Sansa and Theon there but I don't know how that'll fit into our timeline, so I'll wait for your speculations. I thnk it's the same interview, but I don't remember seeing anything about the Boltons going to CB. Maybe there's no Pink Letter, only Ramsay talking to Jon face to face. I can't see those two having pre-battle discussion without trying to kill each other. Would Ramsay just show up to yell at Jon and then ride away?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 10:25:47 GMT
That probably means Sansa and Theon, not Roose and Ramsay. Would be cool though if they went there. But I agree with 7timesdamnedshewolf, I can't see Jon and Ramsay meeting without one of them dying. Also IIRC Domeric has been mentioned in interviews and in one of the S3 History & Lore videos. I don't think they're going to mention him in the show, but I still think it's likely that he existed in the show universe. The dialogue between Roose and Ramsay in 5x05 suggests otherwise, though.
|
|
|
Post by boojam on Apr 2, 2016 10:43:27 GMT
I rewatched ep. 202 today btw (which incidentally is probably my least-favourite episode in the show) and realized that Euron's return to Pyke will probably be paralleled quite a bit with Theon's, albeit with very different power dynamics at play. But if indeed he's greeted by Yara and then meets Balon inside Pyke itself in the second episode of a season, I can imagine a number of other parallels cropping up too in the writing and staging of the scene. In the book , tho it's hard to remember, there are hints that Euron had Balon assassinated, seems the show may have dispensed with the assassin and he does it himself. Tho the show has not introduced Balon's brothers yet. I suppose Theon makes it back before the Kingsmoot? So in a way Theon might pose a threat as a pretender, tho me thinks Theon would decline. Still may be the reason Theon and Yara have to escape? Without Victarion a whole swath of story narrative has to be re-manufactured. How Theon and Yara play into the Ironborn story by going to Essos is a big puzzle.
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 2, 2016 12:41:08 GMT
Yeah, I didn't get the feeling in s5 that Domeric existed in the showverse. I got that feeling too. I do think Walda and her unborn child (the true born heir) will be their way of bringing that Domeric storyline to life. The show was not super subtle with Ramsey's less than enthusiastic reaction to the news he was going to be a "big brother" and making a point of having Sansa remind him that Tommen is also a bastard on the throne. I am also kind of thinking Gendry won't be back at this point :/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 13:24:12 GMT
Gendry will be back
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on Apr 2, 2016 14:59:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by day dreamer on Apr 2, 2016 15:02:34 GMT
I can't see the Bolton's going to Castle Black. Unless they just mean Bolton Bannermen, as that would make sense. But Roose or Ramsay actually going there? No way.
|
|
|
Post by Nezzer on Apr 2, 2016 15:06:06 GMT
I can't see the Bolton's going to Castle Black. Unless they just mean Bolton Bannermen, as that would make sense. But Roose or Ramsay actually going there? No way. They don't need to meet face to face. I could see Ramsay and some horsemen staying outside the gates and talking to Jon from afar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 15:11:38 GMT
It is the same interview Archie linked a few pages back, right? That one with the Britney translation issues? They would likely look for Sansa and Theon there but I don't know how that'll fit into our timeline, so I'll wait for your speculations. I thnk it's the same interview, but I don't remember seeing anything about the Boltons going to CB. Maybe there's no Pink Letter, only Ramsay talking to Jon face to face. Based on the other info the reddit poster translated, it's definitely the same interview we were all trying to figure out earlier with some additional (probably wrong) translations. The thing about Chinese is, because it's such a huge region of the world, there's so many dialects that words can often mean 6 different things depending on the context it's used in. Even other Chinese people misinterpret the written language when it's from somewhere else. I wouldn't put a whole lot of weight into those translations because you could ask 10 different Chinese people and get 10 different answers. However! That being said ... I have wondered how Ramday delivers his line "Winterfell is mine, come and see" in any way that makes sense to Jon if that's in fact who he is saying it to. While that's clearly great "pink letter" type material, how would Jon read it and hear Ramsay's voice saying it - they've never met. It would come across hokey to me.
|
|