Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:24:22 GMT
Hold on. Umbers are siding with the Boltons, at least for the beginning of the battle. Rickon went to Last Hearth in the show. He is most likely dying in Snowbowl. Then we have those two flayed bodies burning on the crosses. After reading through these last pages, I'm sure the other one is Stannis. Now, I don't think that makes much sense, as he has no head and his body would be very hard to find from the battlefield, not to mention his body should be rotten by that point already.
But, what if the other one is Rickon? IIRC WotW stupidly confirmed that he isn't, but what if they just were wrong?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:30:18 GMT
Hold on. Umbers are siding with the Boltons, at least for the beginning of the battle. Rickon went to Last Hearth in the show. He is most likely dying in Snowbowl. Then we have those two flayed bodies burning on the crosses. After reading through these last pages, I'm sure the other one is Stannis. Now, I don't think that makes much sense, as he has no head and his body would be very hard to find from the battlefield, not to mention his body should be rotten by that point already. But, what if the other one is Rickon? IIRC WotW stupidly confirmed that he isn't, but what if they just were wrong? A flayed child? Even for Game of Thrones, that's over the top.. and the other corpse isn't small enough to be Rickon. It's probably not Stannis either. My bet is that they're Northern lords that we are going to be introduced in S6.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:30:56 GMT
Hold on. Umbers are siding with the Boltons, at least for the beginning of the battle. Rickon went to Last Hearth in the show. He is most likely dying in Snowbowl. Then we have those two flayed bodies burning on the crosses. After reading through these last pages, I'm sure the other one is Stannis. Now, I don't think that makes much sense, as he has no head and his body would be very hard to find from the battlefield, not to mention his body should be rotten by that point already. But, what if the other one is Rickon? IIRC WotW stupidly confirmed that he isn't, but what if they just were wrong? The dead bodies on the crosses were dead pre-Snowbowl. Rickon's there alive at least to begin with from what I've gathered. The recently substantiated reddit spoilers said he dies "in battle". So that's what seems to fit with all we've been hearing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:34:52 GMT
Hold on. Umbers are siding with the Boltons, at least for the beginning of the battle. Rickon went to Last Hearth in the show. He is most likely dying in Snowbowl. Then we have those two flayed bodies burning on the crosses. After reading through these last pages, I'm sure the other one is Stannis. Now, I don't think that makes much sense, as he has no head and his body would be very hard to find from the battlefield, not to mention his body should be rotten by that point already. But, what if the other one is Rickon? IIRC WotW stupidly confirmed that he isn't, but what if they just were wrong? The dead bodies on the crosses were dead pre-Snowbowl. Rickon's there alive at least to begin with from what I've gathered. The recently substantiated reddit spoilers said he dies "in battle". So that's what seems to fit with all we've been hearing. Ah, like @diablotion said, I was thinking that flaying a 10 year old and setting the body on fire would be too much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:37:13 GMT
I obviously don't want Rickon to die, because he is a Stark and directly related to my favourite characters. And I also really liked him in all his scenes in the first three seasons. However, we have no idea what role he is going to play in the next season, nor do we know how he will be reintroduced and how - if at all - he dies. So even if he has a death scene, it is way too early to assess and criticise it and say it's only for cheap shock value (a category I'm not even sure can be applied to this show). Besides, the theory that Rickon is just a "shaggydog" is older than the show itself, because it is actually based on the novels. This may very well be a GRRM idea. The tendency to say that everything bad is a D&D invention, and everything good must be from the books is a style of argumentation I'm dreading, because it has no basis whatsoever and has very little to do with actual fair criticism.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:37:54 GMT
The dead bodies on the crosses were dead pre-Snowbowl. Rickon's there alive at least to begin with from what I've gathered. The recently substantiated reddit spoilers said he dies "in battle". So that's what seems to fit with all we've been hearing. Ah, like @diablotion said, I was thinking that flaying a 10 year old and setting the body on fire would be too much. There were burnt kids back in s2. And a murdered baby in ep. 201 IIRC. So I wouldn't discount that kind of brutality ever happening. But the shooting info points against that possibility thankfully.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:44:57 GMT
While speculating on this "surprising death", I think it's LF. I can't see him meeting with both Jon and Sansa in the finale and surviving. I don't think Sansa knows about Petyr's role in Ned's betrayal, but giving her to Ramsay should be reason enough to kill him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:46:39 GMT
Isn't killing a Stark every now and then getting a bit repetitive? If I think about it, killing Rickon this early wouldn't really make any sense. Like the kid has done nothing yet. So do pointless sex scenes and killing off the heroes of the story. And Mel disrobing. So whats a bit of more Stark death Daenerys is still alive. Jon will be back as well. So in my mind the main heroes of the story haven't been killed off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:50:55 GMT
Isn't killing a Stark every now and then getting a bit repetitive? If I think about it, killing Rickon this early wouldn't really make any sense. Like the kid has done nothing yet. So do pointless sex scenes and killing off the heroes of the story. And Mel disrobing. So whats a bit of more Stark death There are no heroes. Only flawed people fighting flawed people. - GRRM
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:52:11 GMT
So do pointless sex scenes and killing off the heroes of the story. And Mel disrobing. So whats a bit of more Stark death There are no heroes. Only flawed people fighting flawed people. - GRRM Just like he doesn't write black and white characters. Give me a break George.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:58:25 GMT
There are no heroes. Only flawed people fighting flawed people. - GRRM Just like he doesn't right black and white characters. Give me a break George. Autocorrect, eh?
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on Mar 17, 2016 14:00:41 GMT
i don't see the point of bringing rickon back to kill him. i really hope that doesn't happen. what about the unfairness of killing off osha? let's not pretend rickon is the one people have a connection to just because he's a stark. shireen was a fucking star of the show compared to this kid.
|
|
|
Post by mattpeto on Mar 17, 2016 14:06:13 GMT
I think the show's reputation about about killing off major characters deaths is overstated. The last major character we lost was Season 3 (Catelyn - POV in Books 1-3). Robb was a minor character in the books. Same for Stannis, Shireen, Tywin, etc.
Selmy was the surprise last season. But he's more of a minor POV anyway. All the other surviving book POV characters are alive (or will be as of 6.02ish). GRRM really didn't kill anybody in AFFC/ADWD.
Sounds horrible, but I'll take a Rickon and Osha deaths over the main core of POV characters.
I think we will lose one major POV characters this season though. We are due.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 14:11:24 GMT
So do pointless sex scenes and killing off the heroes of the story. And Mel disrobing. So whats a bit of more Stark death There are no heroes. Only flawed people fighting flawed people. - GRRM Pretty much this. It depends on how you define "hero". If you want to define a hero as someone who does extraordinary things, then sure, we have heroes in this story (Jon and Daenerys are the most prominent ones), but I don't think this story is about heroism, at least not in the conventional meaning of the word. This story explores motives such as heroism and chivalry, but only to depict how these ideals fail in a morally ambiguous world where politics are more important than virtue. That's why someone like Tywin can say things like "Explain to me why it is more noble to kill 10,000 men in battle than a dozen at dinner." It forces the audience to question their preconceived notions about how a narrative works: the morally superior heroes defeating the morally rotten villains. This is not what GoT/ASoIaF is about. That's why the honourable Ned had to die. That's also why the trope of the good son avenging his dead father also had to fail (Robb). GoT defies expectations by breaking conventional rules of narration, which is not the same as making use of cheap shock value. Forcing heroism on this story would absolutely undercut its complexity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 14:11:47 GMT
I think the show's reputation about about killing off major characters deaths is overstated. The last major character we lost was Season 3 (Catelyn - POV in Books 1-3). Robb was a minor character in the books. Same for Stannis, Shireen, Tywin, etc. Selmy was the surprise last season. But he's more of a minor POV anyway. All the other surviving book POV characters are alive (or will be as of 6.02ish). GRRM really didn't kill anybody in AFFC/ADWD. Sounds horrible, but I'll take a Rickon and Osha deaths over the main core of POV characters. I think we will lose one major POV characters this season though. We are due. The only POV characters we've truly lost so far are Ned and Cat, and other one of them got resurrected as a zombie. Like you said, while of great influence, Tywin, Joffrey, and Stannis aren't major characters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 14:26:57 GMT
Just like he doesn't right black and white characters. Give me a break George. Autocorrect, eh?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 14:32:28 GMT
Another supposedly cheap shock value-moment in this story was of course Stannis burning Shireen. I can see why people didn't like how it was done, because again it defies expectations. Surely the father who loves his only daughter would not burn her to death. That's because the trope of a parent sacrificing their child for the greater good or a deity is extremely old and never rarely ends like this instance here. One of the oldest stories is of course the story of Abraham almost killing his son Isaac. There are a lot of parallels and these parallels are not coincidental. In both cases, we have a chosen one (Stannis and Abraham) who has to sacrifice his child (Shireen and Isaac) for a God (R'hllor and Jahwe). Both stories end differently, though. Jahwe saves Isaac by stopping Abraham. R'hllor, however, is ruthless or possibly doesn't even exist. In GoT the "chosen one" cannot hand over his responsibility to a deity, because in the end he alone killed his own flesh and blood. The God that made him do it doesn't exist and even if he does (which is ambiguous in GoT), the responsibility still lies with Stannis. Shireen died because of Stannis. Again, expectations are shattered, but not for shock value, but in order to achieve a deeper understanding of what we as viewers foolishly expect. Nevertheless, it is absolutely understandable why this would alienate a lot of people. It's very uncomfortable and I confess I often have my problems with it as well, but IMO it's also extremely fascinating storytelling. That's why I'm not too quick to judge Rickon's possible death in S6.
|
|
|
Post by 7timesdamnedshewolf on Mar 17, 2016 14:37:32 GMT
Another supposedly cheap shock value in this story was of course Stannis burning Shireen. I can see why people didn't like how it was done, because again it defies expectations. Surely the father who loves his only daughter would not burn her to death. That's because the trope of a parent sacrificing their child for the greater good or a deity is extremely old and never ends like this instance here. Never? what about the Iphigenia parallels?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 14:47:59 GMT
Another supposedly cheap shock value in this story was of course Stannis burning Shireen. I can see why people didn't like how it was done, because again it defies expectations. Surely the father who loves his only daughter would not burn her to death. That's because the trope of a parent sacrificing their child for the greater good or a deity is extremely old and never ends like this instance here. Never? what about the Iphigenia parallels? You are right. For some reason I completely ignored Greek mythology to make my point. But my main point was that these things occur in a certain cultural and literary context and are not just D&D and GRRM going "OH MAH GAHD SHOCK VALUE!". Of course Iphigenia is another, very fitting example of that. Furthermore, I think Greek mythology holds a special position in our cultural consciousness, because it is often extremely unusual and bold. In this regard, it is much closer to ASoIaF/GoT than everything Hollywood produces these days. That's why I think my point still stands, because this kind of storytelling doesn't happen that often these days. We are simply not used to it anymore and thus expect something different.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 15:06:58 GMT
I am confused about this. Has something new come to light regarding Roose? Anyways, back to Jorah briefly. His moment with Dany in the pits sort of felt like she was accepting him back into the fold, so I don't see him leaving her side unless she sends him on a mission. Reading AdmiralKyrd's Jon and Mel post on Reddit got me thinking about the parallels between Jon and Dany. Dany's first romantic relationship was with Khal Drogo, who was from a different culture. Then she moved onto Daario, but that was more lust. Jon's first big relationship is with Ygritte, who was from a different culture. Then he possibly moves onto Mel. Again that is likely to be more about lust. Their last relationship will be with each other.I wrote about this in an essay discussing the parallels between Dany and Jon. In my opinion I think it's been telegraphed quite clearly. Anyhow, you can read it here: oadara.tumblr.com/post/124585450101/complimentary-counterparts-the-parallel-journey
|
|