|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 11, 2018 12:18:31 GMT
After Mueller had a raid done on Fart's lawyer Michael Cohen, fart tweets: Attorney client privilege is dead. You are guilty, dude.
I wonder what Fart will do about another chemical attack in Syria.
|
|
|
Post by stoneheartsrevenge on Apr 11, 2018 15:11:21 GMT
Anyone watching Zucks being grilled by Congress? One senator just asked him what hotel he stopped in last night and zucks said he wasn’t comfortable sharing that info. Huh, not nice is it Zucks?
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 13, 2018 12:39:24 GMT
Anyone watching Zucks being grilled by Congress? One senator just asked him what hotel he stopped in last night and zucks said he wasn’t comfortable sharing that info. Huh, not nice is it Zucks? Oh God, that was a farce. But I am glad they made him uncomfortable. I have had some friends deactivate their FB's over this stuff. And I am sure many more have. Paul Ryan stepped down. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I won't miss his stupid ass.
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 14, 2018 22:21:57 GMT
Duh, obviously we need to bomb Syria.
I mean, bombing campaigns worked so effectively in Libya, Afghan 2: The Sequel, Iraq, the gulf, Afghan 1: The Soviet Days Palestine, Vietnam and... Errr... I guess WW2?
It just works!
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 15, 2018 12:41:41 GMT
Duh, obviously we need to bomb Syria. I mean, bombing campaigns worked so effectively in Libya, Afghan 2: The Sequel, Iraq, the gulf, Afghan 1: The Soviet Days Palestine, Vietnam and... Errr... I guess WW2? It just works! Yes, it worked so well the first time and Assad totally stopped using chemical weapons on his people... We won't take refugees but we sure have no problem bombing them. Gross.
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 16, 2018 12:23:37 GMT
Me listening and reading to all the stuff James Comey is saying: Still not forgiven about the whole Hillary thing but I appreciate Fart and friends being dragged to filth.
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 16, 2018 18:02:27 GMT
Me listening and reading to all the stuff James Comey is saying: Still not forgiven about the whole Hillary thing but I appreciate Fart and friends being dragged to filth. Eh, I can't say I blame Comey for what happened with Clinton. If there was suspicious activity happening it was his duty to look into it. There were clearly wrongdoings on her part and a lack of transparency which led to a lot of doubt, which of course Trump slurped up and served to his supporters like Kool aid. It's complete karmic irony that now the shoe is on the other foot, Trump is doing not only what she did, but going above and beyond to discredit legitimate government services, and their freedom from political influence because he realises that they pose a threat to his power. Offices like that, as well as military, law enforcement, health and emergency services should always remain politically neutral especially when it comes to one that is expected to hold up the law. Everyone has to be held accountable and to the same standard regardless of any determinate factors outside of culpability. A good part of this whole shitstorm with Trump has been stirred up in large part because Trump couldn't accept that his office isn't immune to inquest or law, and that being president doesn't mean that lawmakers and public services are beholden to you. I mean, he asked for Comey's "allegiance" and did everything in his power to silence any inquest into him. It's painfully obvious from that, above all else that not only does Trump have a wardrobe filled with skeletons, or should I say о́стов, but that he is also painfully unfit to hold an office that is supposed to rely entirely upon public favour and service. Trump idolises authoritarians because he desires to be one. He's an egomaniac, and a rich one who isn't used to been told no. Of course he surrounds himself with yes-men and laps up the applause of the "unwashed masses" so much, he continued holding campaign rallies after he won. He doesn't care about being president, he cares about being a celebrity. Simple as simple is.
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 17, 2018 12:26:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stoneheartsrevenge on Apr 17, 2018 22:13:31 GMT
Look into it yes, report on it before concluding it’s all stuff and nonesense? Nope
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 18, 2018 12:06:45 GMT
Seeing Sean Hannity be roasted over on open fire (even though Faux News is standing by him)
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJoe on Apr 20, 2018 22:44:56 GMT
Happy 4/20
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 20, 2018 23:35:42 GMT
Look into it yes, report on it before concluding it’s all stuff and nonesense? Nope But it wasn't all stuff and nonsense. There's a hypocrisy that exists in politics that it's totally cool when we go after someone who is not aligned with our political views, but if its the reverse, we defend them unconditionally. Everyone needs to be held accountable, particularly those in a position of power, and more so when that power is given by the people, or at least theoretically. Its the same with the antisemitism claims in the UK's labour party. Obviously we need to look into that, we can't ignore something that's a glaring issue because it MIGHT be a hindrance to our political stance. Now these things are often blown out of proportion by the media, but that's not the fault of the people behind the investigation. The Democrats made a choice to back Hilary and actively sabotaged other candidates, it's pretty much a fact at this point that established Democrats attempted to undermine Sanders because he was perceived as too much of a radical unknown. We saw pretty much the same thing in the UK when Corbyn came into leadership of the Labour party, and it's still in part ongoing. Does the media blow things massively out of proportion? Yes. Does that mean that something illegal should be ignored for the sake of preserving political integrity? No. You know how you can preserve political integrity? Be honest, be open, and be transparent. In infuriates me when people argue this line of logic, because how many videos are there of people saying "politicians should be open with their etc...", whether it's Trump on Birth Certificates, or tax returns, or Theresa May talking about MPs who fail in their duties should resign. There is always a hypocrisy to this argument because when the shoes is on the other foot, it never happens. Blaming the investigators doing their job, and not the politicians potentially doing some dodgy, fucked up shit doesn't wash when there's an obvious solution that saves both face and garners respect. It's not an excuse I'm willing to accept. She was one of the foremost figures in the US, it would be impossible for a major organisation to investigate her WITHOUT anyone knowing, and if they refused to explain why, it would seem even more dodgy. Perhaps it's simply time to admit that Western politics are controlled entirely by money players, who regardless of political party, actively sabotage any candidate who expresses an interest in creating a balanced and fair economic system in favour of those who are willing to shill and sell out to major corporate power.
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 21, 2018 13:51:12 GMT
Look into it yes, report on it before concluding it’s all stuff and nonesense? Nope But it wasn't all stuff and nonsense. There's a hypocrisy that exists in politics that it's totally cool when we go after someone who is not aligned with our political views, but if its the reverse, we defend them unconditionally. Everyone needs to be held accountable, particularly those in a position of power, and more so when that power is given by the people, or at least theoretically. Its the same with the antisemitism claims in the UK's labour party. Obviously we need to look into that, we can't ignore something that's a glaring issue because it MIGHT be a hindrance to our political stance. Now these things are often blown out of proportion by the media, but that's not the fault of the people behind the investigation. The Democrats made a choice to back Hilary and actively sabotaged other candidates, it's pretty much a fact at this point that established Democrats attempted to undermine Sanders because he was perceived as too much of a radical unknown. We saw pretty much the same thing in the UK when Corbyn came into leadership of the Labour party, and it's still in part ongoing. Does the media blow things massively out of proportion? Yes. Does that mean that something illegal should be ignored for the sake of preserving political integrity? No. You know how you can preserve political integrity? Be honest, be open, and be transparent. In infuriates me when people argue this line of logic, because how many videos are there of people saying "politicians should be open with their etc...", whether it's Trump on Birth Certificates, or tax returns, or Theresa May talking about MPs who fail in their duties should resign. There is always a hypocrisy to this argument because when the shoes is on the other foot, it never happens. Blaming the investigators doing their job, and not the politicians potentially doing some dodgy, fucked up shit doesn't wash when there's an obvious solution that saves both face and garners respect. It's not an excuse I'm willing to accept. She was one of the foremost figures in the US, it would be impossible for a major organisation to investigate her WITHOUT anyone knowing, and if they refused to explain why, it would seem even more dodgy. Perhaps it's simply time to admit that Western politics are controlled entirely by money players, who regardless of political party, actively sabotage any candidate who expresses an interest in creating a balanced and fair economic system in favour of those who are willing to shill and sell out to major corporate power.Yup. Both my husband and I have been saying we need big money out of politics. Not that it will ever happen.
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 21, 2018 16:48:00 GMT
But it wasn't all stuff and nonsense. There's a hypocrisy that exists in politics that it's totally cool when we go after someone who is not aligned with our political views, but if its the reverse, we defend them unconditionally. Everyone needs to be held accountable, particularly those in a position of power, and more so when that power is given by the people, or at least theoretically. Its the same with the antisemitism claims in the UK's labour party. Obviously we need to look into that, we can't ignore something that's a glaring issue because it MIGHT be a hindrance to our political stance. Now these things are often blown out of proportion by the media, but that's not the fault of the people behind the investigation. The Democrats made a choice to back Hilary and actively sabotaged other candidates, it's pretty much a fact at this point that established Democrats attempted to undermine Sanders because he was perceived as too much of a radical unknown. We saw pretty much the same thing in the UK when Corbyn came into leadership of the Labour party, and it's still in part ongoing. Does the media blow things massively out of proportion? Yes. Does that mean that something illegal should be ignored for the sake of preserving political integrity? No. You know how you can preserve political integrity? Be honest, be open, and be transparent. In infuriates me when people argue this line of logic, because how many videos are there of people saying "politicians should be open with their etc...", whether it's Trump on Birth Certificates, or tax returns, or Theresa May talking about MPs who fail in their duties should resign. There is always a hypocrisy to this argument because when the shoes is on the other foot, it never happens. Blaming the investigators doing their job, and not the politicians potentially doing some dodgy, fucked up shit doesn't wash when there's an obvious solution that saves both face and garners respect. It's not an excuse I'm willing to accept. She was one of the foremost figures in the US, it would be impossible for a major organisation to investigate her WITHOUT anyone knowing, and if they refused to explain why, it would seem even more dodgy. Perhaps it's simply time to admit that Western politics are controlled entirely by money players, who regardless of political party, actively sabotage any candidate who expresses an interest in creating a balanced and fair economic system in favour of those who are willing to shill and sell out to major corporate power.Yup. Both my husband and I have been saying we need big money out of politics. Not that it will ever happen. Agreed, but that's why I truly believe transparency on behalf of politicians is so important. All politicians are subject to corruption, they are after all human, but it doesn't mean we can simply dismiss it as something that's perfectly normal.
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJoe on Apr 27, 2018 0:34:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kingeomer on Apr 27, 2018 12:08:51 GMT
They had to cut him off before he incriminated himself. How about his reasons for not getting Melania a birthday present?
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJoe on Apr 27, 2018 23:41:34 GMT
It's long but worth watching the entire thing just to get some insight into unfiltered Trump and how easily he gets hysterical while ranting about Hillary and DEMOCRATS. There are times where he is just screaming like your crazy old grandpa. It's surreal that this is the President of the United States on national television.
|
|
|
Post by Father of Dragons on Apr 27, 2018 23:48:22 GMT
It's long but worth watching the entire thing just to get some insight into unfiltered Trump and how easily he gets hysterical while ranting about Hillary and DEMOCRATS. There are times where he is just screaming like your crazy old grandpa. It's surreal that this is the President of the United States on national television. At least on the Apprentice they could cut down or edit out his ramblings. Live TV and late-night toilet-tweeting don't allow the same opportunities.
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJoe on Apr 27, 2018 23:54:32 GMT
It's long but worth watching the entire thing just to get some insight into unfiltered Trump and how easily he gets hysterical while ranting about Hillary and DEMOCRATS. There are times where he is just screaming like your crazy old grandpa. It's surreal that this is the President of the United States on national television. At least on the Apprentice they could cut down or edit out his ramblings. Live TV and late-night toilet-tweeting don't allow the same opportunities. What's hilarious(terrifying) is that the Fox News hosts actually cut him off at the end of the interview because he's about to admit a desire to commit obstruction of justice. The way their expressions change as Trump proceeds to implicate himself during the interview is something:
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 28, 2018 5:03:26 GMT
Yay, steps towards Korean peace.
Also, incidentally, the stocks of Lockheed Martin,a global arms company have took a real nose dive. I wonder if they're connected. Hmmmmm...
|
|