|
Post by stoneheartsrevenge on Apr 26, 2016 19:57:10 GMT
Essay incoming I am really in two minds about Melisandre's past. Part of me likes the theory of her being Shiera Seastar and Bloodraven's lovechild. But then, part of me genuinely believes she's just a powerful slave girl. Melisandre has said that her mother was a slave, so naturally, Mel was born one as well. She was sold to a Red Temple. There are several in Essos. Which one? And when did she live in Asshai? I can't find anything mentioning a Temple in Asshai, so when/why was she there? Was she born there? Or did she travel there after becoming a priestess? Melony was perhaps a powerful sorceress before she ever became a priestess. Maybe she was a temple prosititute, but once displayed some magical prowess, and they taught her the ways of being a priestess? Her witchcraft seems different than anything other Red Priests have done. From what I recall in the books, temple prostitute is first step for pretty much all recruits of the Red Temple, and there is a hierarchy that people gradually climb. Seems Mel has climbed a long way. Also, I think it was Volantis Red Temple in the books - she recalls tears of flame, which is indicative of the Volantene slave tattoos I also agree it's not really Priest magic she knows - or at least, not all of it. The tricks, potions, glamours etc. Are probably stuff she learned in the temple, but I think she probably left when she was "senior" enough and did her own thing. During that time she spent time in Asshai and learned Shadowbinding, which explains stuff like how she knows how to create the Shadow Baby. I also like the idea of her as Shiera or a daughter of BR and Shiera. But I won't be upset or surprised if it turns out the significance is the things she has witnessed due to her age, rather than her identity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2016 23:59:55 GMT
I'll just leave this here in case we decide the costume similarities for the Red Priests and Priestesses has any significance to theories and speculations behind their powers and abilities.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 0:03:29 GMT
Maybe its just the style they've connected to asshai. But it would be cool if they made them like maesters chains, in terms of how many links you have determines skill level.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 0:13:51 GMT
Maybe its just the style they've connected to asshai. But it would be cool if they made them like maesters chains, in terms of how many links you have determines skill level. I'd really love to see this have some sort of significance or meaning to the similar pattern. Especially since it was pointed out by boojam that Quaithe isn't a Red Priestess though she was trained the same as Melisandre as a shadowbinder in Asshai.
|
|
|
Post by boojam on Apr 27, 2016 0:31:05 GMT
Maybe its just the style they've connected to asshai. But it would be cool if they made them like maesters chains, in terms of how many links you have determines skill level. I'd really love to see this have some sort of significance or meaning to the similar pattern. Especially since it was pointed out by boojam that Quaithe isn't a Red Priestess though she was trained the same as Melisandre as a shadowbinder in Asshai. I can't find the quote , did Carice say it? Something like, " this is a little war, the Big War is to come", I wish I could find the quote. It seems that the followers of R'hllor , or at least the priesthood, know that the Big War, well she says it in S4, I think, is against the Others.As if the order the religion? Know what is going on with The Nights King (on the show) and that the BIGGER GAME is soon upon Westeros. It is delicious , things are going to get really really bad.
|
|
|
Post by Zadeth on Apr 27, 2016 12:23:16 GMT
Previously, in season 4, we see Mel taking a bath (with her ruby necklace removed). Some, myself included, have said this may be a continuity error. Others, that the power is not directly in the ruby but her changing is more symbolic of a lack of faith.
I only looked at the screenshot of Mel in the bath making the decision it is a continuity error.
I just rewatched the scene, and it seems it could be plausible that Mel was in her true form there; visible to Selyse but not to the audience (as to not give it away).
Selyse does seem... shocked, curious? (I'm not sure if that is the right description of her facial expressions) about Mel in the bath. Sure, it could be her seeing Mel's 'beauty' and feeling sorry for herself, but now it seems to me that Selyse could have seen her true form?
Mel also instructs Selyse to bring her potions, perhaps foreshadowing that potions are involved in her glamour too?
Mel instructs Selyse to bring her a vial with a blue potion in it, and in 6x01, we see some vials on her dresser before the change; none are blue, but we could not have seen them all or the original potion wasn't the glamour potion, but just for foreshadowing.
Though, when Mel removed the ruby necklace it DID glow - this always happens in the show when something is happening regarding Mel's powers (think the poison with Cressen).
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 27, 2016 12:27:41 GMT
Sorry but there is absolutely no way Selyse sees her true form here. Even if the writers planned on Mel being old back then -which I doubt - they definetly didnt think of it enough for Selyse to see true form and not the audience. It's reaching and given the writers far more credit than they deserve. Potions theory is giving them enough benefit of the doubt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 12:32:49 GMT
Great analysis and callback to that curious bath scene in season 4 Zadeth - it was a topic I wanted to get around to discussing eventually as more people are weighing in on it now in discussions on the internet. It's definitely a valid argument on both sides. In particular: I have to suspect Melisandre uses a combination of potions and magic within the ruby as both seem to have been emphasized both in the books and on the show. The potions might actually be what's keeping her alive so long while the ruby's magic is what disguises her looks. Maybe? As for why they didn't show Mel's true form way back in Season 4, it may have been the simple fact as speculated from that remark by the prosthetics lead guy that they weren't ready to do it yet but had been planning it for awhile. Maybe they felt the timing was wrong then and saving it for a more impactful moment (like now) was the better call. It would be neat to know if Selyse saw Mel's true form which is why she follows her so devoutly. But now Selyse and everyone else is dead so we'll probably never know.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 27, 2016 12:37:27 GMT
Great analysis and callback to that curious bath scene in season 4 Zadeth - it was a topic I wanted to get around to discussing eventually as more people are weighing in on it now in discussions on the internet. It's definitely a valid argument on both sides. In particular: I have to suspect Melisandre uses a combination of potions and magic within the ruby as both seem to have been emphasized both in the books and on the show. The potions might actually be what's keeping her alive so long while the ruby's magic is what disguises her looks. Maybe? As for why they didn't show Mel's true form way back in Season 4, it may have been the simple fact as speculated from that remark by the prosthetics lead guy that they weren't ready to do it yet but had been planning it for awhile. Maybe they felt the timing was wrong then and saving it for a more impactful moment (like now) was the better call. It would be neat to know if Selyse saw Mel's true form which is why she follows her so devoutly. But now Selyse and everyone else is dead so we'll probably never know. I dont think prostetics guy talked about this. They merged bodies just last finale and 6h if prosthetics to make someone look older is nothing new or complicated. Bath scene imho is a continuity error since the ruby is off and she immediately turns. Imean if they planned on it back in s4 they would have had her wear necklace in the tub eliminating the hole evident even to unsuilled
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 12:43:34 GMT
Great analysis and callback to that curious bath scene in season 4 Zadeth - it was a topic I wanted to get around to discussing eventually as more people are weighing in on it now in discussions on the internet. It's definitely a valid argument on both sides. In particular: I have to suspect Melisandre uses a combination of potions and magic within the ruby as both seem to have been emphasized both in the books and on the show. The potions might actually be what's keeping her alive so long while the ruby's magic is what disguises her looks. Maybe? As for why they didn't show Mel's true form way back in Season 4, it may have been the simple fact as speculated from that remark by the prosthetics lead guy that they weren't ready to do it yet but had been planning it for awhile. Maybe they felt the timing was wrong then and saving it for a more impactful moment (like now) was the better call. It would be neat to know if Selyse saw Mel's true form which is why she follows her so devoutly. But now Selyse and everyone else is dead so we'll probably never know. I dont think prostetics guy talked about this. They merged bodies just last finale and 6h if prosthetics to make someone look older is nothing new or complicated. Bath scene imho is a continuity error since the ruby is off and she immediately turns. Imean if they planned on it back in s4 they would have had her wear necklace in the tub eliminating the hole evident even to unsuilled It does seem to be a pretty big detail to just accidentally overlook, you're right. As much attention to detail as they pay to costumes (such as the photo I linked showing the similarities between the red priests and Quaithe) you would think they'd have made a solid decision about her ruby necklace back in Season 4, so maybe it really is just a discontinuity issue they are glossing over now. Perhaps GRRM or someone in authority pointed it out to them so they made sure to correct it this season with the big reveal? Without knowing exactly what causes Melisandre to look youthful (or old) we can only speculate about the ruby choker being the main source since it seemed pretty obvious. She took it off, you saw the 'old lady' hand putting it on the dresser before you even saw her image in the mirror - so it was pretty instantaneous and immediately after she removed the necklace.
|
|
|
Post by Zadeth on Apr 27, 2016 12:44:38 GMT
I have to suspect Melisandre uses a combination of potions and magic within the ruby as both seem to have been emphasized both in the books and on the show. The potions might actually be what's keeping her alive so long while the ruby's magic is what disguises her looks. Maybe? As for why they didn't show Mel's true form way back in Season 4, it may have been the simple fact as speculated from that remark by the prosthetics lead guy that they weren't ready to do it yet but had been planning it for awhile. Maybe they felt the timing was wrong then and saving it for a more impactful moment (like now) was the better call. It would be neat to know if Selyse saw Mel's true form which is why she follows her so devoutly. But now Selyse and everyone else is dead so we'll probably never know. That actually sounds plausible. As archiechvyalthan said, a glamour doesn't actually make you young. The potions could be giving her the strength, agility and beauty of a young woman, rather than what she would actually have as a 400 year old woman. But then that doesn't work with her removing the necklace in season 4; which they'll probably explain as a continuity error if they go down this route. Though, the show hasn't had glamours before, IIRC, - so we'll probably skip the potion bit entirely in the show, and have the necklace do everything. Yeah, I'm guessing this could be the prosthetics challenge they were talking about (RIP Stoneheart dream again), so it would make sense that's why we didn't see it back in season 4; which as you said does lend credibility to them having planned this; and perhaps even to Selyse seeing her. I agree about Selyse, it would be very nice if it did happen. If I ever end up meeting D&D and can ask them a question regarding the show, it'll be this. Sadly Sakharov (directed 4x07) and D&D don't have Twitter, or I'd try and get a response there.
|
|
|
Post by mattpeto on Apr 27, 2016 12:48:22 GMT
This happens in all genres of fiction in my opinion. Viewers expect consistent rules on why or why not something imaginary like magic can work sometimes and not others. But the truth is, it can be explained several ways.
#1- She has powers #2 -The ruby has powers #3 - Combination of both
This is my theory.
The Red Ruby is a symbol of her faith. It's her faith that produces the glamour, not the Red Ruby. Her faith was at a super-high with Seylse during the bath scene and didn't need the Ruby.
At the end of season 5, her faith plummeted. But the Ruby was a reminder to her of her Red God and still gave her a little strength.
In 601, when she removed the Red Ruby, she let her faith down and out came her true self.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 27, 2016 12:48:58 GMT
So they planned it and with that knowledge decided for her to have no necklace in the tub and be young and turn old without necklace last episode?
Either they didnt plan this at all or are very very sloppy.
And again the WW and death of Oberyn prostetics are far more complex than this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 12:49:13 GMT
Though, the show hasn't had glamours before, IIRC, - so we'll probably skip the potion bit entirely in the show, and have the necklace do everything. I consider the 'faces' used in the House of Black and White a type of glamouring too though and they did some great special effects work with that last season and probably will again this season. While the actual faces (skin) is just a prop, it's the magic within it that makes the person become that appearance (and also retain some of the thoughts of the original person if I recall from the books). So in a way, we could compare the ruby choker to the faces in the House of Black and White. They are just tools to harness the magic.
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 27, 2016 12:52:33 GMT
Sorry but there is absolutely no way Selyse sees her true form here. Even if the writers planned on Mel being old back then -which I doubt - they definetly didnt think of it enough for Selyse to see true form and not the audience. It's reaching and given the writers far more credit than they deserve. Potions theory is giving them enough benefit of the doubt. I find it more likely that it was simply an oversight on behalf of the director or something along those lines (it didn't particularly have to be D&D at fault here), but it is a big plot hole. Who knows, maybe George hadn't told them this spoiler yet. I find it very unlikely that he hadn't of, but could be possible.
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 27, 2016 12:58:14 GMT
This happens in all genres of fiction in my opinion. Viewers expect consistent rules on why or why not something imaginary like magic can work sometimes and not others. But the truth is, it can be explained several ways. #1- She has powers #2 -The ruby has powers #3 - Combination of both This is my theory. The Red Ruby is a symbol of her faith. It's her faith that produces the glamour, not the Red Ruby. Her faith was at a super-high with Seylse during the bath scene and didn't need the Ruby. At the end of season 5, her faith plummeted. But the Ruby was a reminder to her of her Red God and still gave her a little strength. In 601, when she removed the Red Ruby, she let her faith down and out came her true self. In the books, Stannis' Lightbringer is clearly glamoured by the ruby, as was Mance. Maybe they change it up in the show, but honestly, I think it was a simple oversight. We can all look past the fact that Darth Vader walks through a solid object in Return of the Jedi due to sloppy editing , or the fact you can clearly see a cameraman filming in the mirror in the old Scrooge film. I think we can just chalk this one up to them being sloppy, and the more they try and talk out of this, the more plot holes we'll wind up with.
|
|
|
Post by mattpeto on Apr 27, 2016 12:59:57 GMT
After re-watching the scene, they make a point to show her "magic portions" at 15 sec. So really it could be:
#1- Mel's faith #2 - Mel's ruby #3 - Mel's potions #4 - Combination of any of them.
|
|
|
Post by Mecha-StannisForever on Apr 27, 2016 13:22:16 GMT
After re-watching the scene, they make a point to show her "magic portions" at 15 sec. So really it could be: #1- Mel's faith #2 - Mel's ruby #3 - Mel's potions #4 - Combination of any of them. Or, because this was a pretty throwaway scene, and the director, actors and crew in general didn't know about the spoiler, no one bothered to remember to tell Carice to wear the necklace and the just ran with what they have. Honestly, I think it is an oversight, and the more we try to justify it, the more confusing things get. I'd take away Mel's faith since it seems pretty much shattered right now, though that may be why she took it off. The potions are something that may actually play into it, since Melisandre in the books indicates glamouring a person as someone else requires something of that person, so maybe it has something to do with it, since Mel did mention to Selyse they help her seduce men. I still feel it was an oversight though. In general, I don't think anyone will care, I mean GRRM himself had a characters eyes change colour and a horse change genders.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 27, 2016 13:43:30 GMT
The thing is that u cannot make theories with oversights and incompetence. Well position hints and clues are fun to pick up on but we are dealing with people who forgot how many kids cersei gave birth to.
|
|
|
Post by mattpeto on Apr 27, 2016 13:44:08 GMT
After re-watching the scene, they make a point to show her "magic portions" at 15 sec. So really it could be: #1- Mel's faith #2 - Mel's ruby #3 - Mel's potions #4 - Combination of any of them. Or, because this was a pretty throwaway scene, and the director, actors and crew in general didn't know about the spoiler, no one bothered to remember to tell Carice to wear the necklace and the just ran with what they have. Honestly, I think it is an oversight, and the more we try to justify it, the more confusing things get. I'd take away Mel's faith since it seems pretty much shattered right now, though that may be why she took it off. The potions are something that may actually play into it, since Melisandre in the books indicates glamouring a person as someone else requires something of that person, so maybe it has something to do with it, since Mel did mention to Selyse they help her seduce men. I still feel it was an oversight though. In general, I don't think anyone will care, I mean GRRM himself had a characters eyes change colour and a horse change genders.Yes agreed. To me, I don't think the magic inconsistency is a big deal because it's all bullshit lol.
|
|